Editorial Policy


There is a difference between providing information and describing what is happening in a country and how events outside of our borders affect them. It is impossible to exaggerate the significance of context and point of view. To show how events affect our lives in a human context, our reporters and editors work hard to place a strong emphasis on actual individuals rather than just institutions. Every story must convince readers to invest time in it because we live in such a time-constrained culture. If a news story fails to make an effort to be interesting or convince the reader to care, they will go to another website, flip the page, or switch the channel.

The principles that guide our work stay the same even while our job is changing. Everything we do must be unwaveringly impartial, fair, and true. We are dealing with verifiable facts that are supported by reliable and knowledgeable sources. We aggressively research each side of a story.

It is impossible to exaggerate the value of precision. A error must be fixed as soon as it is identified. Corrections to previously published or broadcast articles shouldn’t be hesitant or sparse. They must be drafted with the goal of making a harm right in the most thorough and comprehensive way imaginable.

Our task is essential. The speed must come first for a news organization committed to meeting 24-hour deadlines. But being dependable is always more important than being speedy.

The importance of taste cannot be overstated. Some pertinent information is downright disgusting. It’s not necessary to approach it that way.


Respecting browse desk standards is the responsibility of our reporters, editors, and managers. Since there are so many variations in reporting, writing, and editing news, it is hard to have precise rules that apply in every situation. Our staff adheres to a number of protocols as part of their duties.

Some of these practices that are most crucial include the following:

If there are even the tiniest grounds for suspicion, a full investigation should be conducted before broadcasting any tale or naming any individual in a narrative. Take it out if you’re unsure. However, don’t use this as a justification to change your mind about an angle before examining it again. Genuine uncertainty must result from a careful examination of all the available data.

Any information whose source is in question should be cited by an authoritative authority or source. Prepare your proof for publishing in the event of a rejection.

Maintain objectivity when discussing news that impacts parties or conflicts. Make sure that all arguments are fairly presented.

Don’t add any editorial comments or opinions; just stick to the facts. Reporters’ opinions shouldn’t be expressed in the copy. Their findings are intriguing. The reader must be provided with accurate background information and authoritative interpretation in order to understand difficult issues.

Correct errors as quickly as you can. The general and worrisome lack of trust in the media among the populace. The lack of trust is a result of a variety of flaws, including inaccuracy, carelessness, disregard for the general public mood, automatic cynicism toward people in public life, perceived bias or unfairness, and other shortcomings indicative of hubris.

Browsedesk can help alter public attitudes by upholding strong factual standards and upholding an unwavering commitment to justice. Some journalists refuse to accept criticism and complaints from other journalists, so we shouldn’t be so quick to dismiss them.

Both common people and powerful corporations can be harmed by news stories. Managers and employees must react quickly and sensitively to errors in order to uphold browsedesk integrity and sensibility. It doesn’t matter if the complaint is made by a terrified individual working alone or by the legal team of a powerful individual.

Every inaccurate story that needs to be corrected must be brought to the supervisory staff’s attention.

Ethical Behavior

Making sure we don’t do anything to devalue the profession or damage our credibility as journalists are part of our responsibility. Because we expose the horrible news about politicians who become dishonest, caregivers who abuse their trust, and business executives who abandon ethics for profit, we must uphold strict ethical standards and be seen to uphold them.

It is challenging to address every potential ethical dilemma in this study. However, we abide by the following guiding principles in the spirit of constantly trying to improve rather than limit our work.

Pride in oneself and in the work of journalism feeds ethical behavior.

The Tech industry can support itself. Staff members should not consent to anything that compromises our credibility or integrity.

Browsedesk does not pay journalists for their time spent on interviews, photos, videos, or audio recordings.

Tech industry reporters never exaggerate facts to get a story. They consistently identify themselves as journalists.


Being impartial is similar to exercising. You must exercise frequently if you want to increase tone and strength.

The best exercise for impartiality is to pause and ask oneself, “Am I being as unbiased, honest, and fair as I can be?”

Other principles of objectivity

All parties to a conflict, whether it be in politics, the law, or another area, are treated equally. Statements from parties with competing interests, whether included in the same story or used at separate times, should be given equal weight.

But for simultaneous publication, try to get opposing opinions whenever you can. If an attack by one organization or individual on another has been reported, any authoritative responses are likewise relayed. Say so and try again if you are unable to locate a trustworthy source.

If someone presents opposing opinions, question their knowledge of the subject. If there is no expertise or if the person does not have a position of authority that lends credence to their ideas, consider if the report should be carried out.


Quotes are a story’s lifeblood. They have the palest rosiness in their cheeks, which tells a story. They strengthen the authority, relevance, and impact of your message.

Abusing them might lead to issues for authors and editors. When it comes to quotes, certain news organizations permit some creative license. Browsedesk will take harsh action if anything is tried to be changed about what was said.

People are quoted directly and almost always in formal English. We fix flagrant grammatical mistakes that would seem bad if left unfixed. We get rid of your speech’s ahs, common foul language, and useless repetitions. We fix careless spelling errors and other typos in emails and SMS communications. When this is not the case, we do not alter the quotations.

While we don’t frequently utilize strange spellings and grammar to demonstrate dialects or mispronunciations, they can be effective in creating an atmosphere.

Cleaning up or paraphrasing this tweet from an adolescent fan would have left out a significant detail from a story regarding pop singer Justin Bieber’s use of Twitter:

I don’t know whether @justinbieber ever reads my tweets, but I’ll keep trying, nonetheless.

No matter how well-known the speaker, bafflegab quotes are frequently paraphrased in straightforward English.


There won’t be any foul language spoken. upholding decency.

Moreover, a word of warning regarding translations. When someone isn’t fluent in English, we shouldn’t assume that he can speak it.

Make it explicit in speeches and interviews what language is being used, unless it is evident. At a news conference where both French and English are spoken, say when French was the initial language. When reporting on the language of protest signs or the cries of the crowd, indicating that a translation was used.

Readers have a right to know when a direct or indirect quote is based on a translation rather than the exact words used.


Since the browse desk switched to become an online news source, the news story has reached a larger audience than ever. The number of editors that stories go through before they are made available to the general public has decreased. Technology improvements have reduced the need for a middleman, enabling us to distribute our material directly to viewers, listeners, and readers — unrestricted and unfiltered.

Because of this, browsedesk has a strict policy against the use of obscenity, which is strictly enforced by managers and well-understood by staff.

Obscenity has no place in a news report, whether it be in print, audio, or video, unless under very specific and exceedingly unusual circumstances.

Four-letter expletives shouted from the crowd or written on an irate protester’s placard don’t add anything to the narrative. The reader, listener, or spectator is not informed by profanity employed just for the purpose of profanity

There are a few situations where filthy language belongs in a news report. An illustration would be a well-known person swearing in public. In other instances, employing profanity is important to fully understand the facts or feelings that underlie a story.

Such instances are, however, quite uncommon.

When reporting on a story, journalists should always look into other options before employing vulgar language. When an obscenity is crucial to the story, a senior Main Desk editor must be informed before any narrative, audio, photos, or videos are transmitted.


There is the potential for offense in every news report. Age, race, sex, physical and mental disabilities, and religion are all subjects that occasionally create news, but they must be handled with caution.

Use justice, sensitivity, and good taste when defining age, color, creed, nationality, physical appearance, religion, sex, sexual orientation, and any other category that could cause a person or group to feel offended.


We must adhere to our promises of anonymity when we make them. It is only right to let potential suppliers know that it is not a guarantee. Reporters may be required by courts to disclose their sources.

Verbal agreements with sources are legally binding and enforceable in court. Make sure you and your source comprehend the agreement’s conditions before you obtain the information. Don’t agree to anything you can’t keep.

For instance, you could consent to not mentioning the source by name in your article or to keep the source’s identity a secret from anybody other than your employer. You cannot ensure that the source won’t suffer if their identity is made public, whether by mistake or as a result of a court order.

An employee’s refusal to obey a court order is not something browsedesk will encourage or demand. It will offer legal representation, either to advise the employee and ask for a closed hearing or to advise the court that disclosure is not essential in the public interest.

Additionally, sources should be informed that reporters must disclose their sources to their supervisors. It might be anyone, from the president to the bureau’s news editor. This does not mandate that every member of the chain of command be informed of the circumstance. A staff member may individually approach the Editor-in-Chief or the President in a sensitive circumstance.

Top management will try to alert the original worker in advance if a source needs to be disclosed above the President’s level.

On particularly critical news tips, complete confidentiality could occasionally be necessary, making it impossible for the browse desk to confirm the information with other sources. Senior management will consult with the original employee in this case. If the circumstances make carrying the material impossible, we won’t do it.

As part of excellent reporting, readers should be given as much background information about the unnamed source as is practical. This makes it easier for readers to decide whether or not the story is worthwhile. The credentials of the unknown source must never be false. You should be able to create a description that is helpful to the reader and respectful of the source with a small bit of thought.

It might be crucial to get input from the source on how to phrase such a description so that the story can inform the reader without giving away the character’s identity.

When asked for additional information, some informants may provide data that can be linked to a specific individual but then demand anonymity. Since it would be misleading to claim that this confidential knowledge came from someone else, it is challenging to attribute it (another Economy Department official, who asked for anonymity, said). Generally speaking, it is best to utilize expressions like It was also learned.

Additional tools for interacting with unnamed sources include:

Use browse desk sources as if they were browsing desk own anonymous sources. Stories from newspapers or television that use anonymous sources should attribute them to the publication or broadcaster: Unidentified officials from the Energy Department reportedly told Washington

The story should mention the source’s desire for anonymity and include a justification for it.

Officials and spokespeople should not be confused. A spokesperson represents the opinions of others, whereas an official helps shape those opinions.

When a made-up name is employed, such as when referring to a troublesome teen or a welfare family, or when a composite person is made to stand in for a group of similar individuals, the ruse needs to be revealed as quickly as feasible. It’s a tool that you can’t use all the time without losing its effectiveness. It must be discussed with a supervisor before use.


The internet and social networking sites like Facebook, where people may share information, have changed how news is gathered. Internet research is typically the first port of call for journalists. Finding people who might have direct knowledge of a significant event, recognizing news tips or trends, finding new sources, and confirming historical details are just a few uses for it.

The same copyright regulations apply to content from websites as they do to content from print publications. When paraphrasing, complete credit must be given, and quote marks must be used when utilized word for word. By giving due attribution, you can prevent accidentally adding other people’s words to your writing.


Errors are unavoidable. Untrue information is reported. When this occurs, getting it fixed as soon as possible should be the major priority.

While other types of information may be accessible for much longer, online stories are typically accessible for at least 24 hours. Although websites can only keep browse desk content up for a certain amount of time per contract, these stories are routinely kept online for much longer. Online tales can take many different forms, in contrast to those in newspapers. They can always be updated because they are current web news. This indicates that there is a far wider opportunity for finishing a Writethru to correct an error than the typical newspaper deadline cycle.

In order to address issues or potential issues with tales, browse desk uses the following techniques:

Writethru Correction modifies the facts or the wording.

Kill – eliminates a false, harmful in terms of the law, or damaging tale.

uses Writethru Correction Sub to replace a story that has been killed.

Corrective — applied to fix an error that has probably already been printed. It was made specifically with the intent of confronting the error and resetting the record. It only addresses facts that have been shown to be false.


The tech industry values privacy highly. We don’t support violating someone’s privacy without cause. It is against the organization’s policy to publicly disclose private behavior, information, or discussion unless the agreement is requested under extraordinary circumstances.

When reporting on death, pain, and sorrow, we believe that the victims’ identities should be protected and that images that degrade the deceased should be avoided.

Copyright and Other Intellectual Property Rights

Examples of intellectual property rights include the following:

Copyright safeguards industrial designs, trademarks, and geographical indications.

This subject is covered by the Copyright Act, the Trade and Merchandise Marks Act, the Patents Act, and the Designs Act.